Search

How can we help?

Business Employment

Unfair dismissal lawyers in London & Thames Valley

Dismissal situations can be difficult for all those involved. Our employment solicitors can offer clear and timely tailor-made advice to guide you through the process. Every employee who has been employed for at least 2 years “the qualifying period of service” has the right not to be unfairly dismissed. In some cases, employees with less than 2 years’ service are also protected.

If there is to be a dismissal, you as the employer must show that the principle reason, falls into one of the categories set out in the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Unless you as the employer can prove one (or more) of the above fair reasons for dismissal, and that your process is fair, then you run the risk of your former employee bringing a claim in the Employment Tribunal, and the tribunal finding your termination to be unfair dismissal.

An exceptional balance of expertise and personality.”

Legal 500

FAQs- Unfair Dismissal

Employees with at least two years’ continuous service have the right not to be unfairly dismissed.  A dismissal will be unfair unless it has been made for one of five legally permitted reasons and the employer has acted reasonably in treating that reason as sufficient to justify dismissal.

The law also sets out a small number of cases where dismissals will be ‘automatically unfair’ for example where dismissals are connected to whistleblowing or asserting a statutory right.  In these cases, it just needs to be shown that the employer dismissed the employee for one of the automatically unfair reasons, there’s no need to consider the reasonableness of the employer’s actions.  This type of claim can be brought by any employee, even those with less than two years’ service.

This refers to a situation where an employee resigns due to the actions of the employer.  There must be a repudiatory breach on the part of the employer and the employee must show that they have resigned as a result of that breach.  The law then effectively converts the resignation into a dismissal for unfair dismissal purposes.

This refers to a situation where an employee is dismissed in breach of contract.  This type of claim often arises as a result of an employee being dismissed without the notice that they are entitled to under their employment contract.

These are:

  • Capability or Qualifications
  • Misconduct
  • Redundancy
  • Contravention of Statute
  • Some Other Substantial Reason

The Government does report on Tribunal statistics quarterly on its website which includes details of average awards.  However, average sums will not give an accurate picture of likely compensation as awards can differ substantially.

Where a Tribunal finds that an employee has been unfairly dismissed, it typically awards two types of compensation, a ‘basic award’ and a ‘compensatory award’.  There are statutory caps that apply to the compensation available for unfair dismissal claims.

The basic award is calculated in the same way as a statutory redundancy payment.  The compensation award is capped at a specific amount prescribed by law (adjusted each year) or  52 weeks’ gross pay if lower.

 

Key contacts

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Global labour standards will have a bigger impact on the UK, whatever the outcome of the election

the Labour Party has set out a radical manifesto for the future of UK employment law and there has been a lot of focus on the changes to laws affecting trade unions. It is worth picking up on further comments by the shadow chancellor today. When he was put on the spot regarding Labour’s position on secondary picketing, he refused to be pinned down but did state: “We will make sure that people have the right, as in the ILO conventions to withdraw their labour.”

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Unfair dismissal due to trade union activities

In the recent case of Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities despite the fact that the disciplinary and appeal officers were not motivated by his union activities.

art
  • 15 November 2019
  • Employment

Changing reasonable adjustments could be discriminatory

Employers should be aware that changing or removing adjustments for a disabled employee could amount to a failure to make reasonable adjustments, even if they are replaced with other adjustments.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

Restrictive Covenants – What’s happened in 2019

There have been some cases in 2019 which have offered employers guidance on restrictive covenants and demonstrated how important it is for employers to review such restrictions carefully.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

How employers should manage workplace romances

It is reported that over 50% of people have engaged in a workplace romance at some time in their career. Following the rise of the #MeToo movement it is fundamental that employers are aware of how to manage romantic relationships between colleagues and that training is provided to ensure compliance with workplace policies.The Chief Executive (“CE”) of McDonalds has this week been fired following a romantic relationship with a fellow employee. Despite the fact that the fast food giant acknowledged that the relationship was consensual, the CE was dismissed as he had violated company policy by engaging in the…

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

Capita not liable to compensate for employee’s racist comments

Employers can be held legally responsible (vicariously liable) for the discriminatory actions of their employees which have taken place in the course of employment. To avoid being held liable, an employer would have to show that it took all reasonable steps to prevent the discriminatory actions from occurring. This is exactly what Capita managed to do in a recent racial harassment case, brought against both Capita and one of Capita’s operations managers.

Clarkslegal’s innovative approach to solving complex cases is consistent; their quality standards are extremely high and their staff are efficient and friendly – overall 11/10!”

Carrol Douglas-Welsh, Head of Employee Relations – Scottish and Southern Energy