Search

How can we help?

Business Employment

Disciplinary & grievance

 

Working relationships are often key to the success of a business, and our employment lawyers understand that where issues arise, they need to be dealt with fairly, swiftly and with as little disruption as possible. 

We offer commercial and practical advice on handling poor performance and conduct issues through disciplinary action, as well as responding to employee grievances, to minimize the risk of Tribunal claims whilst maintaining good industrial/employee relations wherever possible. 

Employee Exits

We can support you with negotiating the exits of both junior and senior employees, with guidance on negotiating exit terms and drafting your settlement agreements. We advise on tricky issues such as notice pay, garden leave, restrictive covenants, share schemes, pension contributions and other employee benefits. We can also help you prepare for and undertake protected conservations to ensure the best outcome for the business.

Performance Management

Underperforming employees can have a detrimental impact on your business’ reputation, performance and staff morale. We can advise you on all aspects of handling performance issues, including performance improvement plans, drafting capability policies, taking disciplinary action, disability discrimination risks and without prejudice negotiations.

An exceptional balance of expertise and personality.”

Legal 500

FAQs – Disciplinary & grievance

A disciplinary procedure is an internal process that an employer has in place to address and deal with allegations of misconduct relating to its employees.  In some cases it may also be used to address issues of poor performance though it is common for employers to have a separate policy for performance management.

Employers should create written grievance and disciplinary policies clearly setting out its expectations and the procedures it has in place.

ACAS produce a guide on these processes (often referred to as the ‘ACAS Code’) which provides a strong foundation for the development of rules and procedures.  Where relevant, a failure to follow the ACAS Code will be taken into account by a Tribunal.

Yes, in the first instance employers will usually try and resolve matters informally.  However, a formal process would be used if this is not successful and/or if the employee requests this.

A grievance refers to a concern an employee has and wishes to raise with their employer.  It’s important for an employer to have an effective procedure for dealing with these so that it can investigate and properly address any concerns raised.

ACAS has produced a guidance document (often referred to as the ‘ACAS Code’) for disciplinary processes which provides a strong foundation for conducting disciplinary meetings. Where relevant, a failure to follow the ACAS Code will be taken into account by a Tribunal.

ACAS sets out the procedure to follow at the disciplinary hearing itself (as well as procedures preceding and following this stage) which includes allowing the individual to be accompanied by a trade union representative or colleague; clearly explaining the complaint to the employee; going through the evidence gathered; and allowing the employee to state their case, raise any relevant points, present evidence, call witnesses and ask questions.

This may differ for different employers and depending on the job roles concerned.  There will also be some instances of misconduct that are so serious they are classed as ‘gross misconduct’.

Examples of misconduct could include minor breaches to policies or contracts; poor timekeeping; damage to property; refusal to follow instructions; obscene language and unauthorised absence.  Examples of gross misconduct could include theft; fraud; misuse of company property; being under the influence of alcohol/illegal drugs at work;  violence; discrimination and serious or repeated breaches of company policy.  These are not exhaustive lists and there are many more examples of misconduct and gross misconduct.

Key contacts

Monica Atwal

Managing Partner

View profile

+44 118 960 4605

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

art
  • 28 November 2019
  • Employment

Landmark Supreme Court judgment extending whistleblowing protection

The Supreme Court, in Jhuti v Royal Mail, has reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision and held that an employee was unfairly dismissed for making a protected disclosure despite the fact that the decision-maker was unaware of the disclosure.

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Global labour standards will have a bigger impact on the UK, whatever the outcome of the election

the Labour Party has set out a radical manifesto for the future of UK employment law and there has been a lot of focus on the changes to laws affecting trade unions. It is worth picking up on further comments by the shadow chancellor today. When he was put on the spot regarding Labour’s position on secondary picketing, he refused to be pinned down but did state: “We will make sure that people have the right, as in the ILO conventions to withdraw their labour.”

art
  • 22 November 2019
  • Employment

Unfair dismissal due to trade union activities

In the recent case of Cadent Gas Ltd v Singh the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has upheld a tribunal decision that an employee was automatically unfairly dismissed because of his trade union activities despite the fact that the disciplinary and appeal officers were not motivated by his union activities.

art
  • 15 November 2019
  • Employment

Changing reasonable adjustments could be discriminatory

Employers should be aware that changing or removing adjustments for a disabled employee could amount to a failure to make reasonable adjustments, even if they are replaced with other adjustments.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

Restrictive Covenants – What’s happened in 2019

There have been some cases in 2019 which have offered employers guidance on restrictive covenants and demonstrated how important it is for employers to review such restrictions carefully.

art
  • 08 November 2019
  • Employment

How employers should manage workplace romances

It is reported that over 50% of people have engaged in a workplace romance at some time in their career. Following the rise of the #MeToo movement it is fundamental that employers are aware of how to manage romantic relationships between colleagues and that training is provided to ensure compliance with workplace policies.The Chief Executive (“CE”) of McDonalds has this week been fired following a romantic relationship with a fellow employee. Despite the fact that the fast food giant acknowledged that the relationship was consensual, the CE was dismissed as he had violated company policy by engaging in the…

Clarkslegal’s innovative approach to solving complex cases is consistent; their quality standards are extremely high and their staff are efficient and friendly – overall 11/10!”

Carrol Douglas-Welsh, Head of Employee Relations – Scottish and Southern Energy