Clarkslegal LLP - Solicitors in Reading and London

Legal Updates

Tribunal runs out of patience for litigant in person

25 November 2016 #Employment

In Liddington v 2gether NHS Foundation Trust, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld an Employment Tribunal’s (ET) decision to award costs against the Claimant, who was acting in person.

Miss Liddington represented herself in a claim for unfair dismissal. She was informed by three separate judges that her claims were not sufficiently particularised. Furthermore, she failed to provide exact dates, which was vital in her case.

Although litigants in person are not to be held to the same standards as lawyers, nor are they expected to provide detailed legal pleadings, the EAT felt Miss Liddington should have been able to comply with the requests for further information and been able to explain what was said or done and when. Her inability to do so amounted to unreasonable conduct which justified the ET’s decision to award costs to the Respondent.

Whilst cost awards in Employment Tribunals are rare, Respondents should be mindful that unreasonable behaviour, such as this, may result in such an award. Respondents should, therefore, consider with their legal representative whether it would be appropriate to issue a cost warning against the Claimant should such behaviour occur.

Clarkslegal, specialist Employment lawyers in London, Reading and throughout the Thames Valley.
For further information about this or any other Employment matter please contact Clarkslegal's employment team by email at by telephone 020 7539 8000 (London office), 0118 958 5321 (Reading office) or by completing the form on this page.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Read more articles


Employment team
+44 (0)118 958 5321