Top Tips for avoiding payment disputes
05 September 2017
Payment disputes continue to be one of the most common problems in the construction industry, and we have published numerous articles on the key court decisions that affect the interpretation of payment provisions. Now we focus less on the gritty detail and more on the important headlines that can help prevent you from falling foul of your own payment obligations. This practical advice is aimed at employers, contractors, subcontractors and consultants who wish to avoid featuring in our next case law update…
Payer (i.e. Employers/Contractors)
- Always be aware of the timescales - keep on top of your deadlines for issuing payment and pay less notices to avoid being the victim of a “smash and grab” adjudication – see our analysis of ISG v Seevic (2014) here for more.
- Check your service of notices provisions - these will usually be separate from the payment provisions, and a notice prepared in good time will not be valid if served late or defectively – see our analysis of Kersfield v Bray (2017) here for more.
- If you fail to issue a timely notice in respect of an interim application, be prepared to pay the full amount - there are few instances in which you will be able to resist payment, and the best course of action may be to think about how to rectify an overpayment at the next application – see our analysis of Galliford Try v Estura (2015) here for more.
- Conversely, if you fail to issue a notice in respect of a final account application, you should be able to revisit the true value of the contract works – note however that you may initially have to pay the full claimed amount – see our analysis Harding v Paice (2014) here and Kilker Projects v Purton (2016) here for more.
- Don’t rush into challenging the validity of a payment application – the prospects of success may be limited based on the court’s guidance and the contractual requirements – see our article here and our analysis of Kersfield v Bray (2017) here for more.
Payee (i.e. Contractors/Subcontractors/Consultants)
- Check that your contract allows for interim payment - applications should be monthly throughout the course of the project. If the contract includes a schedule of application dates, it should also allow for further applications beyond the expiry of that schedule – see our analysis of Balfour Beatty v Grove (2016) here for more.
- Ensure that applications are made at the correct time, clear and unambiguous, state the amount claimed, and detail how it has been calculated – failure to do so may entitle the employer to challenge the validity of your application - see our applications article here for more.
- If the contract imposes further requirements, such as to form or content of an application, do as the contracts says - to avoid rejection of any aspect of your application, ensure that you include sufficient detail and substantiation to the extent that the contract requires.
- If you receive full payment of an interim or final application by reason of the employer’s failure to issue a notice, they will likely seek recovery of any overpayment at the next application or by final account resolution – be prepared for the possibility of a repayment, or that the employer will seek a stay of execution. In certain cases, it may be wiser to negotiate and agree a figure than incur the potentially irrecoverable costs of refuting such a request – see our analysis of Galliford Try v Estura (2015) here and Kilker Projects v Purton (2016) here for more.
Clarkslegal, specialist Construction lawyers in London, Reading and throughout the Thames Valley.
For further information about this or any other Construction matter please contact Clarkslegal's construction team by email at firstname.lastname@example.org by telephone 020 7539 8000 (London office), 0118 958 5321 (Reading office) or by completing the form on this page.
This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.
Read more articles