Search

How can we help?

Icon

The personal guarantee dilemma: Should a director succumb to a personal guarantee?

Should directors give a personal guarantee? What are the implications?

There are two fundamental principles in company law. First, every company has its own legal personality, meaning that it has its own legal identity, which is not the same as the identities of its shareholders and directors. Secondly, in the case of limited companies, which make up the vast majority of companies in England, the liability of shareholders is limited: shareholders are liable to pay for their shares, but they are not liable for the company’s debts. Sometimes, however, directors, developers and employers looking to finance a construction project are being asked by their lender to give a personal guarantee. The question remains, should directors give a personal guarantee? What are the implications?

What is a personal guarantee?

A personal guarantee (also called an individual guarantee) is a promise, given by an individual (the director), to ensure that a third party (the company) fulfils its obligations or, if the third party fails to do so, that the individual will fulfil those obligations. It is a contractual agreement that creates a secondary obligation to support a primary obligation of one party to another. Personal guarantees may take the form of a stand-alone agreement or a simple contract provision. The primary obligation may be to repay a loan made by a lender to a borrower. The guarantor promises the lender that the borrower will perform its obligations and, if it does not do so for any reason, the guarantor will perform them on its behalf.

The personal guarantee essentially acts as security for company borrowing and is a way to pierce the so called ‘corporate veil’. The bank’s standard form guarantee will be drawn to give the bank maximum protection: technically, it will be both a guarantee and an indemnity. An indemnity, like a guarantee, is a promise to be responsible for another’s loss. Unlike a guarantee, it is a primary obligation given by the indemnifier to the person to be indemnified. By framing it as an indemnity the bank makes the director liable even if there is a problem with the underlying loan. In practice the bank is very unlikely to look to the director to pay unless the company has defaulted on the loan and enforcement has been unsuccessful. Strictly, though, it could make a claim at any time.

Things to consider

There are many things to consider before giving a personal guarantee to secure your company’s borrowings. Firstly, you should ensure that there is a monetary limit on the guarantee obligation. That way you will need to sign a new personal guarantee if a new company loan is to be taken. Without a cap you could find yourself personally liable for increased borrowings without appreciating that you are increasing your personal liability. You could also be liable for new borrowings taken by the company after you have ceased to be a director.

Secondly, you should consider linking the guarantee to a specific loan. This is a good way to avoid ever increasing personal liability as company borrowings increase.

A personal guarantee (also called an individual guarantee) is a promise, given by an individual (the director), to ensure that a third party (the company) fulfils its obligations or, if the third party fails to do so, that the individual will fulfil those obligations.

Thirdly, you should avoid securing the loan by a legal charge over your house. If you do agree to give such security, the co-owner of the house (such as a spouse or partner) will also need to agree to give the security. Such a security will put your house (and your equity portion held by both co-owners) at risk.

Finally, you should also consider your duties owed as a director. The guarantee will place a director in a situation where his interests may conflict with those of the company, meaning he will need to declare his interest in the relevant transaction to the other directors, and may be prohibited from voting under the company’s articles of association. This situation should be approved by an ordinary resolution of the shareholders or by the other directors.

Conclusion

It is understandable that a director’s main goal is to progress his business, and ensuring finance is available by securing a loan facilitates this. Nevertheless, a director should always consider what the implications of signing such a guarantee entail and weigh up the options carefully. In any case, a director should seek legal advice when being asked to commit to a personal guarantee.

For further information on how we can support you with a personal guarantee please contact us.

Disclaimer

This information is for guidance purposes only and should not be regarded as a substitute for taking legal advice. Please refer to the full General Notices on our website.

Author profile

About this article

Read, listen and watch our latest insights

Pub
  • 09 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

The Arbitration Act 2025 – Factsheet

This factsheet outlines the major reforms and key developments introduced by the Arbitration Act 2025, including updates on summary disposal, jurisdictional challenges, emergency arbitrators, arbitrator disclosure duties, and governing law in arbitration proceedings.

art
  • 09 July 2026
  • Immigration

Right to Work Checks are changing from 1 October 2026: Is your business ready?

The Home Office’s new rules, effective 1 October 2026, will overhaul right to work checks and raise the risk of civil penalties for UK businesses.

art
  • 08 July 2026
  • Privacy and Data Protection

ICO prosecutes employee under the Data Protection Act for forwarding client data to his personal email address

The issue of employees taking confidential business information or personal data when moving to a new employer remains a significant concern for businesses.

Pub
  • 07 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Accelerating arbitration: Expedited procedures and key changes in the new ICC Rules – Episode 2

In episode 2, Jack Hobbs (Clarkslegal) and Christopher Howitt (Three Stone) explore how the latest expedited and highly expedited procedures under the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026 are transforming the landscape of dispute resolution.

art
  • 07 July 2026
  • Employment

6 month unfair dismissal rights: What employers need to know

Under the new Employment Rights Act 2025 the minimum period of service required to qualify to bring a statutory claim for unfair dismissal has been reduced from 2 full years to 6 months from 1 January 2027 onwards.  

art
  • 02 July 2026
  • Litigation and dispute resolution

Litigation and Artificial Intelligence: Where are we now?

In the recent case of Cork and another v Smith, the High Court publicly admonished a law firm and two of its solicitors after they had produced and submitted two AI-generated letters to the court containing misleading and false information in relation to a block transfer application made under Rule 12.37 of the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016.