Clarkslegal LLP - Solicitors in Reading and London

Legal Updates

Trade union rep potentially fairly dismissed for not so picture perfect activities

09 February 2017 #Employment


In the case of Metroline RATPDEV Ltd v Morris, the EAT held the Claimant’s activities of storing, using or disseminating confidential information did not amount to ‘trade union activities’ and did not, therefore, attract the protection of automatic unfair dismissal.

The Claimant was a trade union representative and was in possession of confidential information relating to the company’s recent restructure. One of the company’s line managers recorded notes regarding the restructure in a personal diary and someone within the business took photographs of these notes without the line manager’s knowledge or consent. As several members of the Claimant’s trade union were affected by the restructure, the photographs were sent to the Claimant.  The Claimant shared the photographs and was dismissed for doing so.

The tribunal found that the Claimant’s dismissal was automatically unfair because it related to carrying out trade union activities. On appeal, the EAT held that the tribunal judge had failed to consider whether the Claimant’s activities went beyond his role as a trade union representative and set aside both findings of automatic and normal unfair dismissal.  The EAT judge commented

 “the information retained and stored by the Claimant was information that was private, confidential and unlawfully obtained.   In my judgment, as a matter of principle, dismissal for the retention of unlawfully obtained information for trade union activities in general does not enjoy the protection of section 152 (automatic unfair dismissal for taking part in trade union activities”

The case was remitted to a different tribunal for a rehearing and the EAT warned that if the Claimant’s claims were to fail on a rehearing, the tribunal judge should carefully consider whether a costs order should be made against him.  

Whilst a welcome decision for employers in demonstrating that trade union reps cannot hide behind their status when carrying out unlawful or wrongful activities, employers should still take care to assess whether an individual’s acts constitute lawful trade union activities. If you are unsure, please speak to a member of our employment team.

Clarkslegal, specialist Employment lawyers in London, Reading and throughout the Thames Valley.
For further information about this or any other Employment matter please contact Clarkslegal's employment team by email at employmentunit@clarkslegal.com by telephone 020 7539 8000 (London office), 0118 958 5321 (Reading office) or by completing the form on this page.

Read more articles

Kate Walsh

Kate Walsh
Senior Solicitor

E: kwalsh@clarkslegal.com
T: 0118 960 4692
M: 07776 305 578

Contact

Employment team
+44 (0)118 958 5321