Clarkslegal LLP - Solicitors in Reading and London

Legal Updates

Respondent successful in cost application and EAT agrees

16 April 2012 #Employment


In most cases in the tribunal costs orders are the exception rather than the rule, unlike other areas of litigation where the general rule is that costs follow the event and the unsuccessful litigant normally has to foot the legal bill for the litigation.

Not this time, the EAT, in Peat & ors v Birmingham City Council, upheld a decision by the tribunal to award costs against a group of claimants.  The case makes interesting reading.

The Claimants claimed unfair dismissal, having been dismissed and re-engaged following an extensive collective consultation over implementing a Single Status Agreement.  During proceedings, the Respondent’s solicitors sent the Claimants a detailed costs warning letter but the Claimants continued with their claims. After the Respondent was successful at the liability hearing, it made an application for costs against the Claimants and was successful. 

The Claimants appealed the decision to the EAT but were unsuccessful in their appeal.  The EAT found that it was not necessary for the Respondent to satisfy the tribunal that the Claimants had no reasonable prospect of success in their claims, and that it was unreasonable conduct on the part of the Claimants to fail to engage with the Respondent in relation to the costs warning letter.

For further information please refer to employmentbuddy’s Award of Costs Fact sheet.

Clarkslegal, specialist Employment lawyers in London, Reading and throughout the Thames Valley.
For further information about this or any other Employment matter please contact Clarkslegal's employment team by email at employmentunit@clarkslegal.com by telephone 020 7539 8000 (London office), 0118 958 5321 (Reading office) or by completing the form on this page.

Read more articles

Contact

Employment team
+44 (0)118 958 5321