Clarkslegal LLP - Solicitors in Reading and London

Legal Updates

Employment status: Smoke & (car) mirrors can`t disguise reality

04 August 2011 #Employment


In 2009 we reported the Court of Appeal decision that a group of car valets, employed under terms and conditions purporting to make them self-employed were, in fact, employees. This decision has now been upheld by the Supreme Court in Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher (2011).

The valets` contracts described them as "self-employed subcontractors", included a substitution clause and stated that valets were under no obligation to provide services on any particular occasion. Moreover, the valets were offered no guarantee of work, paid their own tax and had to purchase their own insurance, uniforms and materials.   

The valets` were claiming that they were "workers" and so entitled to certain minimum rights (minimum wage, paid holiday).  However, the Supreme Court (in agreement with the Court of Appeal) went further in holding that they were in fact "employees".

Regardless of what was written in the contract, the Supreme Court confirmed that it is the true nature of the relationship that is relevant. In reality, the valets were expected to turn up to work every day and do the work provided, and no one seriously expected them to provide a substitute.  Consequently, they were employees.

Clarkslegal, specialist Employment lawyers in London, Reading and throughout the Thames Valley.
For further information about this or any other Employment matter please contact Clarkslegal's employment team by email at employmentunit@clarkslegal.com by telephone 020 7539 8000 (London office), 0118 958 5321 (Reading office) or by completing the form on this page.

Read more articles

Contact

Employment team
+44 (0)118 958 5321